Lately, Walla Walla wines have become expensive. I'm not going to lie to you, I would like to drop $50.00 on a bottle of wine, but unless it's a special occasion, forget it. But I did want to try something from the Walla Walla AVA, and I was lucky enough to find something for less than $15.00.
It was a non-vintage table wine.
Not only weren't the grape types listed, there wasn't even any indication of what types of grapes, and in what proportions, were in the wine. Surely a $16 bottle of wine could deliver, despite its shadowy origins, right?
For the price, you'd expect that the wines from the Walla Walla region contained something...special. Perhaps some certain soil type or climate anomoly produced grapes of superior quality. Or was it that the area attracted only top notch winemakers? From what I knew, I bet on the latter.
The Walla Walla AVA was established in 1984, so there is a bit of history there. (Of course the French would scoff at 20 years as being any sort of history.) The soil in the Walla Walla AVA is a sedimentary sandy loam, not unlike what you'd expect in the rest of the Columbia Valley encompassed AVAs, however the climate is a bit different in that the rainfall is unusually high for eastern Washington (19" annually) due to the proximity of the Blue Mountains, but at the same time it receives a typically high rate of 3000 average
growing degree days.
The wine:
Forgeron Cellars "Red Table Wine"Walla Walla, WAAlcohol: 13.8%Retail (approx.): $14.99As you would expect from anything labeled "Red Table Wine", the color was a dark, dark red, and the nose fairly balanced. Mellow, with a berry and oak aroma that hinted, not so subtly, at a full body. And it was a full body. The berry flavor was balanced and mellow; the sort of wine you would serve if you had a larger dinner party and weren't quite sure of the tastes of your guests. This wine isn't going to offend anyone.
On the flipside, most red table wines come off as functional at best, and this one was a definate step above. The age old question, 'Does it taste better because it's priced higher, or is it priced higher because it tastes better?' did cross my mind, but because I was skeptical going in (not even a vintage year?), I will conclude that the grapes were of a higher quality.
Also, it did not come in a half gallon jug.
We chose the wine because it was a "throw it together at the last minute with what we have on hand" dinner. Boneless, skinless chicken breasts, pounded flat, and rolled around prosciutto, feta cheese and spinach.
In this instance the chicken was merely the vehicle, and the salty influence of the stuffing complimented the the big flavor and sweetness of the wine, and cut straight through the full body.
The brussel sprouts represented well for a vegetable, topped with a salt/spice mix. Brussel sprouts seem to have a very faint sulphur quality, which matched nicely with the sulphur overtones of the wine, overtones you usually don't notice with a red.
Forgeron's Red also finished nicely with a dark chocolate (I'm not going to lie, it was a Hershey bar), and contrary to what we've found in the past, the bitter chocolate and full, sweet wine was better than usual.
The wine proved to be a fine hub to what was a hastily put together meal. I suppose the lesson here is that if you're going to throw some random ingredients together, and serve a table red with it, spending a little extra on the wine will elevate what might be an otherwise mediocre meal.
I'll give credit to the winemaker(s) in this instance.
3.3